|
Dr.
Stanley
Insler,
Chairman of
the
Department
of
Linguistics
at Yale
University,
1978-1989,
is a
world-renowned
Gathic
scholar. His
translation
of the
Gathas is
widely
considered
to be one of
the most
current and
definitive
works on the
subject. He
was educated
at Columbia,
Yale, the
University
of Tubingen,
and the
University
of Madras.
He has
taught at
Yale since
1963, where
he presently
holds the
position of
Salisbury
Professor of
Sanskrit and
Comparative
Philology.
He has
lectured and
published
widely on
subjects
dealing with
the ancient
languages
and texts of
India and
Iran,
including
the Gathas,
and is a
member of
the American
Oriental
Society, the
Royal
Asiatic
Society of
Great
Britain, the
German
Oriental
Society, and
the French
Oriental
Society,
among
others.
Zarathushtra
Author, Dr.
Stanley
Insler
We live in
troubled
times today,
when danger,
uncertainty,
deception
and
ignorance
seem to be
rampant.
Terrorist
acts occur
with
alarming
frequency
and outbreak
of war in
different
parts of the
world
appears to
be imminent.
Disclosure
of financial
frauds and
scams occurs
often and
even the
highest
courts of
the lands
try to
subvert the
established
decisions of
the past.
The
stability of
our lives
seems
threatened,
and our
expectations
for a
peaceful and
prosperous
future
appear to be
undermined
and thwarted
by these
malicious
actions.
Frustration,
despair and
disillusionment
are
commonplace,
and the
search for
positive
changes
among these
depressing
situations
seems to
lead
nowhere. At
every turn
we encounter
disappointment;
anxiety
gnaws at our
brains and
emotions.
We feel all
these
disturbing
things
strongly
because we
are part of
these vexing
times, and
they impinge
upon every
aspect of
our lives.
Our pain is
a living
pain, and
there seems
to be no
remedy at
hand that
can quiet
it. But
these
unfortunate
and often
disastrous
situations
have
occurred
throughout
history, and
in many
cases they
have been
documented
in detail.
This was
especially
true in the
20th
century,
when
literacy and
communication
had
developed on
a global
scale,
matching
only the
development
of the means
of mass
destruction.
But if we
reach back
further into
history, we
also find
ample
evidence and
testimony of
such
malicious
acts and
depressing
conditions
that were
recorded for
future
generations.
Remarkably,
nowhere have
these
matters been
noted with
such clarity
and such
passion as
in a small
collection
of poetic
hymns that
stand at the
beginning of
Iranian
literary and
religious
history.
Here I am
referring to
the Songs
of
Zarathustra,
an
extraordinary
collection
of some 250
poetic
verses
composed by
a remarkable
philosopher
and
religious
innovator
whose name
is the basis
of the world
religion
known as
Zoroastrianism.
Zarathustra
lived
sometime in
the very
early
centuries of
the 1st
millennium
before our
era, and he
taught and
preached
most
probably in
the northern
reaches of
Iran. All
that
survives
from his
fertile and
penetrating
mind is a
small set of
sacrificial
hymns
chiefly
dedicated to
Ahura Mazdā,
The Wise
Lord, who
was his
supreme god.
Despite the
scantiness
of this
collection
of hymns,
known as
gāthās
in his
language,
Zarathustra
left an
indelible
imprint on
the
subsequent
history of
Iran.
Zarathustra’s
times were
as troubled
as ours
today. He
informs us
in his work
that evil
rulers
attack just
and innocent
people, that
the rich rob
the poor,
that the
judges
produce
false
decisions in
order to aid
their
benefactors.
Zarathustra
goes on to
say that
fury and
violence
assault the
people and
that
everywhere
deceit and
deception
hold the
upper hand.
Like us,
Zarathustra
often
expresses
his despair
and
frustration
to Ahura
Mazdā, and
although he
longs for
change, he
sometimes
wonders
whether such
positive
change will
ever take
place.
However,
driven by
anguish and
yet moved by
what he
called the
disease of
his world,
like a
physician
Zarathustra
sought to
find a
remedy to
heal and
cure it. He
began his
quest by
searching
for those
things which
were
unchanging
and
immutable,
things that
resisted the
perfidy and
upheavals in
the world
that
surrounded
him. These
he found in
the elements
of nature,
such as the
sun, moon,
stars, wind,
waters,
plants and
the like.
Moreover,
Zarathustra
noted that
these
elements
reappeared
with both
reliability
and
regularity.
The sun rose
and set each
day, the
moon cycled
each month,
the stars
reappeared
every night,
the flow of
rivers was
constant,
plants and
crops grew
anew every
year. All
these
elements
clearly
obeyed an
overarching
principle of
nature that
both
maintained
them in an
unchanging
manner and
also
imparted
order to
their
existence.
Like his
Indoiranian
forefathers,
Zarathustra
called this
principle
truth.
But who
created
these
immutable
elements of
nature and
who
formulated
the
principle of
truth
that
controlled
the order of
these things
in the
world?
Furthermore,
what was the
purpose in
doing so?
Surely only
a being of
great power
and wisdom
was capable
of
fashioning
these
elements and
creating the
principle of
truth
that gave
rise to
their
eternal
design and
rhythm. This
divine and
superior
being
Zarathustra
named Ahura
Mazdā, the
Wise Lord,
and for the
prophet,
Ahura Mazdā
was the only
true and
valid god.
Furthermore,
Zarathustra
understood
why the Wise
Lord had
fashioned
these
things.
Ahura Mazdā
had also
created all
living
beings, and
through his
good
thinking
the Wise
Lord
realized
that there
had to be a
way to
sustain and
nourish
these
creatures.
This was the
purpose of
the
harmonious
and
unchanging
design of
nature. It
was created
for the good
of the
living
world.
Through
these
reflections,
Zarathustra
conceived of
a totally
new
religious
system in
which
wisdom,
truth,
and good
thinking
were its
highest
principles,
a system
intended to
produce
well-being
and
continuing
life in
the world of
mankind.
However, if
it had been
Ahura
Mazdā’s
intention to
create a
good life on
earth, why
was the
world of man
beset by
unsettling,
dangerous
and menacing
conditions?
Zarathustra
easily saw
the answer.
It was
because evil
also existed
in the
world. In
fact,
everywhere
Zarathustra
looked, he
found an
evil
counterpart
to every
good
condition.
Besides
peace and
friendship,
abundant
food and
water there
were war and
enmity,
starvation
and drought;
besides
knowledge
and
understanding,
loyalty and
respect
there were
ignorance
and
prejudice,
opposition
and
disrespect.
In all his
reflections
on the human
condition,
Zarathustra
realized
that for
every bright
aspect of
life there
was also a
dark side,
and
consequently
he was able
to
systematize
all of human
existence
and human
endeavor
into two
camps: the
side of good
and the side
of evil.
What, then,
was the
cause of
evil? If
truth
was the
principle
that
organized
the good and
beneficial
aspects of
life, then
its
counterpart
must be
responsible
for what is
evil and
destructive
in the
world. In
Zarathustra’s
conception,
that
counterpart
was
deceit.
Deceit,
in all its
manifestations,
was the
corrosive
principle of
existence
that
viciously
strove to
undermine
the
principles
of the good
life.
Consequently,
for the
founder of
this new and
innovation
religious
and
philosophical
system,
there was no
middle
ground, no
centrist
position.
There
existed only
two opposing
forces in
the world,
and these
were
truth
and
deceit.
Furthermore,
every man
was free to
choose to
ally himself
either with
the side of
truth
or the side
of
deceit.
There was no
predestination
in
Zarathustra’s
religion.
There was
only free
will, and
every
responsible
person was
obliged to
choose sides
in the
continuing
and dynamic
conflict
between good
and evil.
Out of these
profound
reflections
Zarathustra
envisioned a
different
world order
that he
called the
good
vision.
It was the
vision of
the world of
mankind
governed by
the same
harmonious
and reliable
principle of
truth
that
controlled
the order of
the
immutable
elements of
nature, and
it could be
promoted
among men
through
understanding
and
good
thinking.
Whether
as
individuals
or as ruling
authorities,
Zarathustra
believed
that this
rule of
truth and
good
thinking
could be
enacted on
earth
through
good
thoughts,
good words
and good
deeds,
if
people
understood
that it was
necessary to
eliminate
every form
of deceit
in their
world .
These were
the only
means to
achieve
well-being
and
continuing
life on
earth.
Zarathustra’s
life was not
easy. His
ideas were
too radical
for the
traditional
community in
which he was
raised. He
tells us in
his poetry
that he was
driven from
his family
and land,
and that he
wandered
under great
hardship
until he was
accepted by
the nobleman
Vishtaspa,
whose tribe
or clan
became the
first
adherents of
Zarathustra’s
teaching.
This was a
modest
beginning
assuredly,
but
Zarathustra’s
ideas were
so
persuasive
that they
were
subsequently
adopted by
the great
empires that
arose in
Iran.
Throughout
history the
Iranians
were famed
for their
great
respect for
truth, an
enduring
testimonial
to the
majestic
teachings of
Zarathustra.
Today
Zarathustra’s
ideas seem
in no way
radical, but
offer in
many
respects the
paradigm for
building a
good life
for all
mankind.
Organizations
like The
United
Nations
strive to
bring peace
and
prosperity
to the world
by
condemning
war,
terrorism
and
aggression,
by
eliminating
disease,
hunger, and
poverty, by
encouraging
understanding
and
discussion
among
disputing
countries.
Other
public-minded
organizations
attempt to
control the
globalization
of greed and
deception.
All these
beneficial
activities
mirror ideas
that are
prominent in
the
teachings of
Zarathustra.
As
individuals
we must also
take a firm
and
unswerving
stand for
promoting
truth in
the world.
Although our
personal
efforts may
seem useless
in the
broader
picture of
things, they
can be
effective in
our dealings
and
relations
with other
individuals.
Indeed
Zarathustra
enjoins us
in his
Songs to
win each
other
through
truth
because it
will be of
great
benefit to
us. The
method is
simple.
Through
good
thoughts,
good words
and good
deeds
each of us
can promote
the good
life on
earth in our
family,
among our
friends and
in our
communities.
The battle
against
deceit
can be won
in a
cumulative
campaign,
but it
demands
commitment,
perseverance
and loyalty
from every
person who
believes in
truth.
* * * *
*
|