Professor
Kaikhosrov
D. Irani
is Professor
Emeritus of
Philosophy
at the City
College of
New York,
where he was
also past
chair of the
Department
of
Philosophy.
He has
served as
Director of
the Academy
of Sciences
and
Humanities
of the city
University
of New York,
and is a
member of
the Academy
of Science
in New York,
the American
Philosophical
Association,
the
Philosophy
of Science
Association,
and the
American
Academy of
Religion. In
1981, he
delivered
the
Government
of India
Fellowship
Lectures at
the K.R.
Cama
Oriental
Institute.
He has
lectured in
his field at
such
institutes
of higher
learning as
UCLA, the
Universities
of Michigan,
London,
Goetingen,
Vienna and
Rome.
What Should
Zarathushtrian
Education
Be?
Author,
Professor
Kaikhosrov
Irani
Regardless
of the
context of
the
educational
situation,
the
religious
teaching of
the Prophet
Zarathushtra
must be the
central
focus. The
religious
vision we
find in the
Gathas must
be presented
with a
minimum of
interpretive
gloss and no
novel
doctrinal
creations
such as
those
generated by
deviant
contemporary
groups.
§1 It must
be observed
that
Zarathushtra’s
is not a
mythological
religion, it
is certainly
not magical;
it is what
may be call
a
Reflective
Religion.
Zarathushtra
calls upon
the
prospective
believer to
reflect on
the vision
he offers
and come to
his or her
own
conviction.
It is
therefore
not a
prescriptive
religion,
contrary to
the notion
of some of
our
teachers.
The
Religious
Vision
Zarathushtra
offer is a
fusion of a
View of
the World
and a Way
of Life.
This is
generally
the form of
Enlightened
Religions.
This is the
Form
of the
Religion.
§2 a) The
View of
the World
is given in
terms of an
Ideal, the
Ultimate
Truth,
called Asha.
The Material
World was
supposed to
evolve
progressively
to realize
it. There
are two
moral
polarities
in the
material
world; one
vector
moving the
world toward
Asha, the
other, in
opposition,
moving the
world toward
disorganization
and
destruction.
This is the
Dualism in
the
Religion.
The world we
live in is
meant to
evolve
toward
perfection,
but is
contaminated
and its
progress
impeded.
b) The
Way of
Life
is to work
toward the
actualization
of Asha, the
Divine Plan.
This we do
because we
are endowed
with
Vohumano,
the Good
Mind, an
aspect of
the Divine
Mind, which
enables us
to see,
regarding
any
situation,
what it
ideally
ought to be,
i.e.,
according to
Asha.
c) Thus the
way of life
is not an
ethic of
prescription,
but one in
which a
person is
required to
take the
responsibility
of making
righteous
decisions,
articulating
and
implementing
them, i.e.
Good
Thought,
Good Word,
Good Deed.
This is the
content of
the doctrine
and must be
disclosed in
an adequate
education.
§3 This life
of
reflective
righteousness
is what a
human being
offers to
Ahura Mazda
as religious
offering.
Such a life
provides
self-justifying
existence
leading to
perfecting
integrity –
Haurvatat,
and becomes
the basis
for final
bliss –
Amaretat.
§4 This
moral vision
is the
religious
teaching of
Zarathushtra.
One
sometimes
hears the
complaint
that this is
just ethics,
or that it
is
indistinguishable
from
contemporary
humanist
ethics. Such
views emerge
from two
misconceptions:
i) This is
not an ethic
based on
social
norms, it is
rooted in an
Ideal
Righteous
Order of
Divine
origin, Asha.
ii) The
religion of
Zarathushtra
is the life
of Ethical
Commitment.
It has been
known from
ancient
times as the
Religion of
the Good
Life, or the
Religion of
Good
Conscience.
This is not
a religion
of
supernatural
drama, not
one of pure
submission,
nor one of
comfort or
rest, but
one of
responsibility
for
instituting
the Right.
§5 Of course
all
religions
have ritual
components.
Personal
rituals of
Confirmation,
Marriage,
and Funeral
Service must
be taught as
reaffirming
our
doctrinal
commitment.
Social
rituals are
significant
as they
bring the
voice of the
community in
collective
recollection
and piety.
§6 Social
practice
which have
emerged must
become
known, but
their
continuance
must be
evaluated in
terms of the
coherence
with the
doctrinal
core. This
is a faith
of
Reflective
Commitment
not a
religion of
blind
obedience!
* * * *
*
|